The Hills · Car accident lawyer help

Car accident lawyer help for people in Maraylya

Not every fault question needs a lawyer. The free check tells you whether yours does.

Being partly to blame for a car accident usually reduces a claim rather than ending it. Being found mostly at fault is different, and the line between the two is worth understanding. People from Maraylya can use our free check by phone or online to see which side of that line the evidence points to, and whether a lawyer's view would help before you accept the insurer's position.

Postcode: 2765

  • Free claim check, no obligation
  • By phone & online, no office to visit
  • Helping people in Maraylya & Pitt Town

Local context for a fault question in Maraylya

The M2, the M7, Windsor Road and Old Windsor Road carry much of the Hills traffic. Motorway merges and lane changes at speed can leave two drivers with very different accounts of the same crash. Fault is decided on the evidence as a whole. Skid marks, damage patterns and the final positions of the cars can say more than either driver's account. Traffic slows for pick-ups, bus stops and people crossing. A low-speed collision in that setting can still raise real questions about who should have given way, so note what each vehicle was doing.

Region
The Hills
Postcode
2765
Transport in the region
Sydney Metro North West (Rouse Hill, Kellyville, Bella Vista, Norwest, Hills Showground, Castle Hill, Cherrybrook) · North-West T-way buses along Old Windsor Road

At the scene: what to notice for fault

The insurer that decides fault will not have been there. It relies on what people recorded at the time. So record what you can: the time, the weather, the road surface, the lane markings and the direction each vehicle was travelling. If a witness stopped, ask whether they'll give their name. A note written that evening is worth more than a memory months later.

  • The lane each vehicle was in, and any lane change
  • Skid marks, debris and the damage to each vehicle
  • Names and phone numbers of anyone who saw it
  • Weather, light and the road surface at the time

Read next:What to do after a car accident in NSW

How fault is shown after a car crash

An independent witness, someone with no link to either driver, can carry real weight. Get their name and phone number at the scene if you can. If you can't, the police record may have their details. Photos of the final positions of the vehicles also matter, since damage patterns often show the angle and order of impact.

The police event number links your claim to the official record of the crash. The insurer can use it to check who was involved and what was reported. It's worth getting even if the crash seemed minor and police didn't attend, because a record made close to the time is harder to dispute than one pieced together later.

  • Dashcam footage, saved as the original file
  • Photos of both vehicles' damage and final positions
  • Independent witnesses' names and numbers
  • Camera footage from nearby shops or homes

Save footage early

Shops, buses and homes with cameras often keep footage only briefly. Ask in writing as soon as you can, giving the date, time and exact spot.

Where fault leaves your claim: four common positions

People often assume that being at fault means getting nothing. That isn't how the NSW scheme generally works. The four situations below show what usually changes as your share of the blame goes up.

  1. Situation 1

    You were not at fault

    Your claim goes to the CTP insurer of the vehicle that caused the crash. You can receive statutory benefits, and if your injury is more than a threshold injury, a common law damages claim may also be open to you.

  2. Situation 2

    You were partly at fault

    Sharing some of the blame generally doesn't stop a claim. It can reduce weekly payments after the first 52 weeks and cut down any damages in proportion. How much is often argued, which is where advice helps.

  3. Situation 3

    You were wholly or mostly at fault

    'Mostly at fault' means contributory negligence greater than 61%. Weekly payments and treatment and care are then generally limited to the first 52 weeks, with no common law damages. Children 16 and under keep treatment and care for as long as they need it.

  4. Situation 4

    No one was clearly at fault

    Unexplained crashes sit in a grey area. The 'blameless accident' provisions may allow a claim where no driver was at fault, but they don't fit every situation. Talk it through with someone who knows them before you rule anything out.

General information, not legal advice. Fault and contributory negligence are decided on the evidence. Time limits apply.

Two people going through a form together at a kitchen table, with a calculator and a laptop

Free claim check

Not sure where fault leaves you? Ask us

We'll look at the evidence of fault and your deadlines, and connect you with an independent lawyer only if your claim needs one.

Free · No obligation

Fault, statutory benefits and damages

Think of the claim in two parts. Statutory benefits come first and, for most people, don't depend on who caused the crash. Common law damages come later and depend heavily on it: another driver must have been at fault, you must not have been mostly at fault, and the injury must be more than a threshold injury. That is why fault is worth attention early.

Rules change

The fault rules and benefit limits described here apply to accidents from 1 April 2023. Earlier accidents can have different limits, so check the rules for your accident date.

Read next:At fault vs not at fault

If the insurer says you contributed

Insurers look at more than who hit whom. They may ask whether you wore a seatbelt, how fast you were going and whether you were distracted. The finding is usually a percentage. A small one trims damages and later weekly payments. One greater than 61% has a much bigger effect, because it rules out damages altogether.

Check the percentage

A contributory negligence finding is usually expressed as a percentage. A few points either side of the 'mostly at fault' line can decide whether damages are possible at all, so ask how the figure was worked out.

Read next:Can I claim if I was partly at fault?

If you were the passenger

A passenger isn't driving, so a passenger is rarely found at fault for the crash itself. The claim goes to the CTP insurer of whichever vehicle was at fault. If your own driver caused it, that's the Green Slip of the car you were in, even when the driver is a friend or family member. The insurer responds to the claim, not the driver personally.

Passengers in a crash between two cars sometimes find that each driver blames the other and neither insurer will accept the claim at first. You don't have to take sides. Give an honest account of what you saw, lodge on time, and let the fault question be worked out between the insurers. If it stalls, that's when advice helps most.

Read next:Passenger injury claims

Several vehicles, several insurers: working out fault

When three or more vehicles are involved, fault can be divided between several drivers. That affects which insurer deals with you and may affect how any damages are shared between insurers later. It generally doesn't stop you receiving statutory benefits while that is argued. If the insurers are still disputing it weeks after you lodge, advice is worth getting.

The police event number is often the thread that ties a multi-vehicle crash together. It links the drivers, the vehicles and any statements taken at the scene. Keep it with your registration notes. CTP Assist, a free SIRA service on 1300 656 919, can help identify an insurer when you're unsure, though it won't decide fault for you.

Read next:Multi-vehicle accidents

When fault is disputed

If the other driver says you caused the crash, or the insurer won't accept that the other driver did, the evidence decides it. This is the point where an independent lawyer is often worth talking to. They can test the insurer's reasons, gather what's missing and advise whether to ask for a review. Insurers make decisions under the scheme rules, and those decisions can be challenged.

Read next:At-fault self-check

Do you need a lawyer for a fault question?

Whether you need legal help depends less on how the crash happened and more on what the insurer decides about fault. Use these points as a rough guide, and the free claim check if you're still unsure.

Often worth talking to a lawyer

  • No driver seems to be at fault and you've been told you can't claim
  • Fault is split between several drivers and no insurer will take the claim
  • The other driver changed their story after the crash
  • Your injury may be more than a threshold injury and fault will decide damages

You may not need one

  • You were a passenger and nobody disputes which driver caused it
  • The other driver admitted fault and the insurer accepted it
  • Your question is about payments, not about who caused the crash

If the insurer says you were mostly at fault, ask for its reasons in writing and note the date on the letter. An internal review is generally due within 28 days of receiving the decision. At fault vs not at fault

Not quite your situation?

  • If you're not yet sure whether this is an injury claim, a damage claim or something else, the car accident claim page helps you tell them apart. Car accident claim in Maraylya
  • If you're engaging a solicitor and want to know what happens between now and settlement, the car accident solicitor page walks through it. Car accident solicitor in Maraylya
  • If you were riding, walking or cycling, or travelling by truck, bus or rideshare when you were hurt, the motor vehicle accident page fits better. Motor vehicle accident lawyer in Maraylya

Frequently asked questions

Ready to talk it through?

Get a free, no-obligation claim check. It's the first step toward understanding where your claim stands and what help it needs.

CTP Lawyer is not a law firm. This page is general information, not legal advice; the independent lawyer you speak with can advise on your own situation.

Call now — (02) 7238 7379Free claim check