Newcastle & the Hunter · Car accident lawyer help

Car accident lawyer Lemon Tree Passage: drivers, passengers and fault

Plain answers on shared blame, seatbelt arguments and disputed fault, then the right help for your claim.

You don't have to prove fault on the day of the crash, but what you notice then can matter later. Lanes, signals, where the cars stopped and what was said all feed into the insurer's view. For people in Lemon Tree Passage, we explain how fault is weighed in a NSW claim and help you decide whether the question needs a lawyer. Often it doesn't. When it does, we'll connect you with one.

Postcode: 2319

  • Free claim check, no obligation
  • By phone & online, no office to visit
  • Helping people in Lemon Tree Passage & Tanilba Bay

Lemon Tree Passage: local roads, car parks and evidence of fault

Nelson Bay Road, the Pacific Highway and the Newcastle Inner City Bypass carry heavy local traffic. If the insurer says you contributed to a crash there, ask how it reached its percentage. Intersections along Lemon Tree Passage Road can involve turning arrows, give-way signs and changing lights. If fault is argued, a photo of the signals and lane markings taken on the day is hard to dispute. Traffic slows for pick-ups, bus stops and people crossing. A low-speed collision in that setting can still raise real questions about who should have given way, so note what each vehicle was doing.

Region
Newcastle & the Hunter
Postcode
2319
Main roads
Lemon Tree Passage Road

At the scene: what to notice for fault

The insurer that decides fault will not have been there. It relies on what people recorded at the time. So record what you can: the time, the weather, the road surface, the lane markings and the direction each vehicle was travelling. If a witness stopped, ask whether they'll give their name. A note written that evening is worth more than a memory months later.

  • Skid marks, debris and the damage to each vehicle
  • Names and phone numbers of anyone who saw it
  • Exactly what the other driver said, written down that day
  • Whether you and your passengers wore seatbelts

Read next:What to do after a car accident in NSW

Seatbelts, speed and your share of fault

Contributory negligence means you are found to have contributed to the crash or to your own injuries. Common examples are not wearing a seatbelt, speeding, or travelling with a driver you knew had been drinking. It doesn't usually stop a claim. It can reduce weekly payments after 52 weeks and reduce damages, and above 61% you are treated as mostly at fault.

Check the percentage

A contributory negligence finding is usually expressed as a percentage. A few points either side of the 'mostly at fault' line can decide whether damages are possible at all, so ask how the figure was worked out.

Read next:Can I claim if I was partly at fault?

Fault and your claim: four situations

Fault rarely decides whether you can claim at all. Most injured people get statutory benefits whoever caused the crash. What fault changes is how long those benefits can run and whether a lump sum is possible. These four positions cover most car accidents.

  1. Situation 1

    You were not at fault

    If another driver caused the crash, their vehicle's CTP insurer deals with your claim. Having no share of the blame keeps the most options open, including a later damages claim where the injury goes beyond the threshold.

  2. Situation 2

    You were partly at fault

    Partial fault is common and usually a question of degree. A finding of contributory negligence can lower weekly payments beyond 52 weeks and reduce damages, so the percentage the insurer picks is worth checking.

  3. Situation 3

    You were wholly or mostly at fault

    'Mostly at fault' means contributory negligence greater than 61%. Weekly payments and treatment and care are then generally limited to the first 52 weeks, with no common law damages. Children 16 and under keep treatment and care for as long as they need it.

  4. Situation 4

    No one was clearly at fault

    Unexplained crashes sit in a grey area. The 'blameless accident' provisions may allow a claim where no driver was at fault, but they don't fit every situation. Talk it through with someone who knows them before you rule anything out.

General information, not legal advice. Fault and contributory negligence are decided on the evidence. Time limits apply.

An older man and a younger woman working through something together on a laptop at home

Free claim check

Car crash near Lemon Tree Passage? Free fault check

We'll look at the evidence of fault and your deadlines, and connect you with an independent lawyer only if your claim needs one.

Free · No obligation

If you were the passenger

Being a passenger doesn't make fault irrelevant. It shifts the question to the drivers. If the driver of your car and another driver both contributed, your claim may involve both vehicles' insurers. Your own conduct can still come up in limited ways, such as not wearing a seatbelt or travelling with a driver you knew was affected by alcohol.

Many passengers hesitate to claim because the driver was someone close to them. It helps to know the claim is made against the CTP insurer, which exists for exactly this situation. The driver may be asked for their account, and any fault finding affects their own claim, not your right to make yours. Talk it through if you're worried about how it will land.

Read next:Passenger injury claims

How fault is shown after a car crash

Fault is decided on evidence, not on who sounds more certain. The usual pieces are the police event number and any police record, photos of where the cars stopped, the damage to each vehicle, dashcam footage and independent witnesses. No single piece is always decisive. Together they usually show what happened, even when the drivers tell different stories.

Your own account matters too, and consistency is what gives it weight. Write down what happened soon after the crash and keep that note. When you later describe the crash to the police, the insurer or a lawyer, tell it the same way. Differences between early and later accounts are one of the first things an insurer looks for.

  • Dashcam footage, saved as the original file
  • The police event number and any police record
  • Camera footage from nearby shops or homes
  • Any messages the other driver sent after the crash

Save footage early

Many dashcams loop and record over older files. Copy the crash footage to another device straight away, and keep the original file untouched.

Chain crashes and split blame

When three or more vehicles are involved, fault can be divided between several drivers. That affects which insurer deals with you and may affect how any damages are shared between insurers later. It generally doesn't stop you receiving statutory benefits while that is argued. If the insurers are still disputing it weeks after you lodge, advice is worth getting.

Passengers and drivers caught in the middle of a chain crash often feel stuck between insurers. Your claim generally shouldn't stall while the insurers sort out their shares. Keep a note of every call, who you spoke to and what they said. If no insurer will take responsibility, that is a good moment to ask for advice.

Read next:Multi-vehicle accidents

What fault changes in your claim

Most people hurt in a car crash can claim statutory benefits regardless of fault, covering weekly payments and reasonable and necessary treatment and care. Fault matters most for the lump sum. Common law damages are only possible if another driver was at fault, you were not mostly at fault, and your injury is more than a threshold injury. So a fault finding against you can close off damages even while benefits are paid.

Rules change

The fault rules and benefit limits described here apply to accidents from 1 April 2023. Earlier accidents can have different limits, so check the rules for your accident date.

Read next:At fault vs not at fault

When fault is disputed

Being told you caused a crash when you believe you didn't is stressful, especially when damages depend on it. Before you respond, gather what you have: the event number, photos, footage, witness details and your own notes. Then get advice. An independent lawyer can say whether the finding looks sound and what challenging it would involve.

Read next:At-fault self-check

Do you need a lawyer for a fault question?

A lawyer isn't a box to tick after every crash. When fault is clear and accepted, many people run their own claim. When it's argued, split or pinned on you, advice is often worth having.

Often worth talking to a lawyer

  • You were a passenger and both drivers blame each other
  • You've been asked for a detailed statement about how the crash happened
  • A seatbelt or speed argument is being used to cut your claim
  • Your injury may be more than a threshold injury and fault will decide damages

You may not need one

  • It was a clear rear-end collision and liability is accepted
  • The other driver admitted fault and the insurer accepted it
  • You only need help identifying the at-fault vehicle's insurer

Fault may be the legal question, but evidence decides it. Keep the police event number, photos, dashcam footage and witness details together, and write down your own account while it's fresh. What to do after a car accident

Not quite your situation?

Frequently asked questions

Ready to talk it through?

Get a free, no-obligation claim check. It's the first step toward understanding where your claim stands and what help it needs.

CTP Lawyer is not a law firm. This page is general information, not legal advice; the independent lawyer you speak with can advise on your own situation.

Call now — (02) 7238 7379Free claim check