Central West, Orana & Far West · Car accident lawyer help

Gilgandra car accident lawyer: when fault is argued

Free, by phone or online. We tell you honestly whether a fault question needs a lawyer.

Fault after a car crash is rarely all or nothing. The insurer may split it between drivers, reduce your claim over a missing seatbelt, or accept the other driver's account over yours. If you live in or travel through Gilgandra, our free claim check helps you understand what a fault finding means for you, and whether an independent lawyer should test it. There is no obligation and nowhere you need to go.

Postcode: 2827

  • Free claim check, no obligation
  • By phone & online, no office to visit
  • Helping people in Gilgandra

Gilgandra roads and the question of fault

The Great Western Highway, the Mitchell Highway and the Newell Highway carry traffic between Bathurst, Orange and Dubbo. Livestock and wildlife on the road can raise questions about whether anyone was at fault. Public hospitals serving the area include Dubbo Base Hospital. Ambulance and emergency notes usually record how the crash was described on the day, which can matter if the other driver's account changes later. Traffic slows for pick-ups, bus stops and people crossing. A low-speed collision in that setting can still raise real questions about who should have given way, so note what each vehicle was doing.

Region
Central West, Orana & Far West
Postcode
2827
Main roads
Newell Highway · Castlereagh Highway
Nearest public hospital
Dubbo Base Hospital

At the scene: what to notice for fault

Fault arguments are built from small details. Before the cars are moved, if it is safe, photograph where each one stopped and the damage to each. Look for skid marks, debris and the traffic signals. Then write a short account in your own words: where you were going, what you saw, and when you first noticed the other vehicle. Keep it factual and keep it.

  • The lane each vehicle was in, and any lane change
  • What the traffic lights or give-way signs showed
  • Where each car came to rest, photographed before moving if safe
  • Skid marks, debris and the damage to each vehicle

Read next:What to do after a car accident in NSW

If you were the passenger

Passengers usually have the simplest fault position of anyone in a crash. You weren't in control, so the question is only which driver caused it, and that decides which insurer deals with you. Where both drivers share the blame, you may still be blameless yourself. That matters later, because damages depend partly on your own share of fault.

Many passengers hesitate to claim because the driver was someone close to them. It helps to know the claim is made against the CTP insurer, which exists for exactly this situation. The driver may be asked for their account, and any fault finding affects their own claim, not your right to make yours. Talk it through if you're worried about how it will land.

Read next:Passenger injury claims

Where fault leaves your claim: four common positions

People often assume that being at fault means getting nothing. That isn't how the NSW scheme generally works. The four situations below show what usually changes as your share of the blame goes up.

  1. Situation 1

    You were not at fault

    If another driver caused the crash, their vehicle's CTP insurer deals with your claim. Having no share of the blame keeps the most options open, including a later damages claim where the injury goes beyond the threshold.

  2. Situation 2

    You were partly at fault

    Partial fault is common and usually a question of degree. A finding of contributory negligence can lower weekly payments beyond 52 weeks and reduce damages, so the percentage the insurer picks is worth checking.

  3. Situation 3

    You were wholly or mostly at fault

    Being at fault doesn't leave you with nothing. Statutory benefits generally continue for the first 52 weeks, but a damages claim is off the table. The same applies once contributory negligence is found to be greater than 61%.

  4. Situation 4

    No one was clearly at fault

    When a crash was nobody's fault, the claim isn't necessarily over. Under the 'blameless accident' rules, an injured person may be able to claim as if someone were at fault. Whether they apply depends on the facts.

General information, not legal advice. Fault and contributory negligence are decided on the evidence. Time limits apply.

A clipboard of blank forms, folders and pens laid out on a wooden desk

Free claim check

Talk through who caused the crash

Tell us what happened and what the insurer has said about fault. We'll point you to the right help, whether that's a lawyer, a doctor or neither.

Free · No obligation

How fault is shown after a car crash

Dashcam footage is often the clearest evidence of fault, but many cameras record over themselves within hours or days. Save the original file as soon as you can, and don't trim or edit it. If another driver or a nearby business may have footage, ask early and in writing, because it may not be kept for long.

Your own account matters too, and consistency is what gives it weight. Write down what happened soon after the crash and keep that note. When you later describe the crash to a doctor, the insurer or a lawyer, tell it the same way. Differences between early and later accounts are one of the first things an insurer looks for.

  • Dashcam footage, saved as the original file
  • Photos of both vehicles' damage and final positions
  • Independent witnesses' names and numbers
  • Photos of signals, signs and lane markings

Save footage early

Many dashcams loop and record over older files. Copy the crash footage to another device straight away, and keep the original file untouched.

Seatbelts, speed and your share of fault

Contributory negligence means you are found to have contributed to the crash or to your own injuries. Common examples are not wearing a seatbelt, speeding, or travelling with a driver you knew had been drinking. It doesn't usually stop a claim. It can reduce weekly payments after 52 weeks and reduce damages, and above 61% you are treated as mostly at fault.

Check the percentage

A contributory negligence finding is usually expressed as a percentage. A few points either side of the 'mostly at fault' line can decide whether damages are possible at all, so ask how the figure was worked out.

Read next:Can I claim if I was partly at fault?

Whose insurer, when fault is shared or unclear

In a two-car crash, the injury claim usually goes to the CTP insurer of the car at fault, which is your own vehicle's insurer if you caused it. When fault is shared or unclear, the insurers may not agree at first. That shouldn't hold up your claim. Lodge with the insurer that fits the evidence you have, and let the fault question be worked out as the claim proceeds.

Passengers and drivers caught in the middle of a chain crash often feel stuck between insurers. Your claim generally shouldn't stall while the insurers sort out their shares. Keep a note of every call, who you spoke to and what they said. If no insurer will take responsibility, that is a good moment to ask for advice.

Read next:Multi-vehicle accidents

What fault changes in your claim

Think of the claim in two parts. Statutory benefits come first and, for most people, don't depend on who caused the crash. Common law damages come later and depend heavily on it: another driver must have been at fault, you must not have been mostly at fault, and the injury must be more than a threshold injury. That is why fault is worth attention early.

Rules change

Your accident date decides which rules apply. Accidents before 1 December 2017 fall under the older 1999 Act, and some limits changed again on 1 April 2023.

Read next:At fault vs not at fault

When fault is disputed

Being told you caused a crash when you believe you didn't is stressful, especially when damages depend on it. Before you respond, gather what you have: the event number, photos, footage, witness details and your own notes. Then get advice. An independent lawyer can say whether the finding looks sound and what challenging it would involve.

Read next:At-fault self-check

Fault after a crash: when to call a lawyer, and when you may not need one

Plenty of car accident claims never involve a fault argument. The ones that do often benefit from advice, because fault controls the lump sum. These lists show when a lawyer is commonly worth a call on fault, and when you may manage alone.

Often worth talking to a lawyer

  • No driver seems to be at fault and you've been told you can't claim
  • The insurer puts your share of fault above 61%
  • Your injury may be more than a threshold injury and fault will decide damages
  • You were a passenger and both drivers blame each other

You may not need one

  • It was a clear rear-end collision and liability is accepted
  • The other driver admitted fault and the insurer accepted it
  • You only need help identifying the at-fault vehicle's insurer

Before any fault argument, get the right care. We can connect you with doctors and allied health experienced with CTP claims, who can treat you and complete a clear Certificate of Fitness whatever happens with fault.

Not quite your situation?

Frequently asked questions

Ready to talk it through?

Get a free, no-obligation claim check. It's the first step toward understanding where your claim stands and what help it needs.

CTP Lawyer is not a law firm. This page is general information, not legal advice; the independent lawyer you speak with can advise on your own situation.

Call now(02) 7238 7379Free claim check