Liverpool & Fairfield · Car accident lawyer help

Car accident lawyer Edensor Park: drivers, passengers and fault

Not every fault question needs a lawyer. The free check tells you whether yours does.

Drivers and passengers hurt in a crash near Edensor Park often hear early on who the insurer thinks caused it. That view can be wrong, and it can be challenged. Fault is decided on evidence such as police records, photos, footage and witnesses, not on who apologised or who sounded more certain. We are not a law firm. We check where your claim stands and connect you with an independent lawyer when fault is genuinely in dispute.

Postcode: 2176

  • Free claim check, no obligation
  • By phone & online, no office to visit
  • Helping people in Edensor Park & Bonnyrigg Heights

Local context for a fault question in Edensor Park

The Hume Highway, the M5 and the M7 carry commuter and freight traffic through Liverpool and Fairfield. In a crash with several vehicles, each insurer may take a different view of who caused it. Much of the local driving happens on Edensor Road, Quarry Road and Cabramatta Avenue. After a crash on one of them, note the lane you were in, the nearest cross street and the signals, because fault often turns on those details. If you were taken to Fairfield Hospital, the ambulance and emergency records often note the type of impact, such as being hit from behind or side-on. That early description can support your version of how the crash happened.

Around bus stops for Fairfield, Cabramatta and Liverpool, traffic slows for pick-ups, bus stops and people crossing. A low-speed collision in that setting can still raise real questions about who should have given way, so note what each vehicle was doing.

Region
Liverpool & Fairfield
Postcode
2176
Main roads
Edensor Road · Quarry Road
Nearest public hospital
Fairfield Hospital
Getting around
bus services to Fairfield, Cabramatta and Liverpool

At the scene: what to notice for fault

Fault arguments are built from small details. Before the cars are moved, if it is safe, photograph where each one stopped and the damage to each. Look for skid marks, debris and the traffic signals. Then write a short account in your own words: where you were going, what you saw, and when you first noticed the other vehicle. Keep it factual and keep it.

  • The lane each vehicle was in, and any lane change
  • What the traffic lights or give-way signs showed
  • Where each car came to rest, photographed before moving if safe
  • Whether you and your passengers wore seatbelts

Read next:What to do after a car accident in NSW

Contributory negligence: when you share the blame

A seatbelt argument is the classic example. If the insurer says your injuries were worse because you weren't belted in, it may reduce what you receive. The percentage isn't set by a formula. It's argued on the evidence, including medical opinion about how each injury happened, which makes it worth checking rather than simply accepting.

Check the percentage

A contributory negligence finding is usually expressed as a percentage. A few points either side of the 'mostly at fault' line can decide whether damages are possible at all, so ask how the figure was worked out.

Read next:Can I claim if I was partly at fault?

Fault and your claim: four situations

The insurer will form a view about who caused the crash, and that view shapes the rest of your claim. Find the situation closest to yours below, then check the detail with someone who can see your evidence.

  1. Situation 1

    You were not at fault

    No share of the fault is the strongest position. Benefits come from the at-fault vehicle's insurer, and a lump sum damages claim may follow if your injury isn't a threshold injury. The insurer still needs evidence before it accepts fault.

  2. Situation 2

    You were partly at fault

    Partial fault is common and usually a question of degree. A finding of contributory negligence can lower weekly payments beyond 52 weeks and reduce damages, so the percentage the insurer picks is worth checking.

  3. Situation 3

    You were wholly or mostly at fault

    Being at fault doesn't leave you with nothing. Statutory benefits generally continue for the first 52 weeks, but a damages claim is off the table. The same applies once contributory negligence is found to be greater than 61%.

  4. Situation 4

    No one was clearly at fault

    Some crashes happen without any driver being at fault, for example after a sudden medical episode or an unforeseeable mechanical failure. NSW has 'blameless accident' rules that may let an injured person claim in some of these cases. They are technical, so get advice.

General information, not legal advice. Fault and contributory negligence are decided on the evidence. Time limits apply.

A bearded man on a phone call indoors, looking down as he listens

Free claim check

Talk through who caused the crash

Free and no obligation. Call (02) 7238 7379 or send a few details online, and we'll help you work out where fault leaves your claim.

Free · No obligation

Evidence that settles fault

Dashcam footage is often the clearest evidence of fault, but many cameras record over themselves within hours or days. Save the original file as soon as you can, and don't trim or edit it. If another driver or a nearby business may have footage, ask early and in writing, because it may not be kept for long.

Your own account matters too, and consistency is what gives it weight. Write down what happened soon after the crash and keep that note. When you later describe the crash to a doctor, the insurer or a lawyer, tell it the same way. Differences between early and later accounts are one of the first things an insurer looks for.

  • Photos of both vehicles' damage and final positions
  • Independent witnesses' names and numbers
  • Your own written account from the first days
  • Any messages the other driver sent after the crash

Save footage early

Many dashcams loop and record over older files. Copy the crash footage to another device straight away, and keep the original file untouched.

What fault changes in your claim

Think of the claim in two parts. Statutory benefits come first and, for most people, don't depend on who caused the crash. Common law damages come later and depend heavily on it: another driver must have been at fault, you must not have been mostly at fault, and the injury must be more than a threshold injury. That is why fault is worth attention early.

Rules change

Your accident date decides which rules apply. Accidents before 1 December 2017 fall under the older 1999 Act, and some limits changed again on 1 April 2023.

Read next:At fault vs not at fault

If you were the passenger

Being a passenger doesn't make fault irrelevant. It shifts the question to the drivers. If the driver of your car and another driver both contributed, your claim may involve both vehicles' insurers. Your own conduct can still come up in limited ways, such as not wearing a seatbelt or travelling with a driver you knew was affected by alcohol.

Children in the car are in a special position. Whoever caused the crash, a child aged 16 or under at the time can keep receiving treatment and care for as long as they need it. Usually a parent or guardian lodges the claim for them. Fault can still matter for other entitlements, so keep the police record with the child's medical records.

Read next:Passenger injury claims

Several vehicles, several insurers: working out fault

Chain collisions are where fault gets complicated. The driver who started it may carry most of the blame, but a driver behind who was following too closely can share it. Each vehicle has its own Green Slip insurer. Your task is to record every vehicle involved and the order of the impacts; the insurers' task is to sort out which of them responds.

Passengers and drivers caught in the middle of a chain crash often feel stuck between insurers. Your claim generally shouldn't stall while the insurers sort out their shares. Keep a note of every call, who you spoke to and what they said. If no insurer will take responsibility, that is a good moment to ask for advice.

Read next:Multi-vehicle accidents

Fault disputes: when a lawyer is worth a call

If the other driver says you caused the crash, or the insurer won't accept that the other driver did, the evidence decides it. This is the point where an independent lawyer is often worth talking to. They can test the insurer's reasons, gather what's missing and advise whether to ask for a review. Insurers make decisions under the scheme rules, and those decisions can be challenged.

Read next:At-fault self-check

Do you need a lawyer for a fault question?

Whether you need legal help depends less on how the crash happened and more on what the insurer decides about fault. Use these points as a rough guide, and the free claim check if you're still unsure.

Often worth talking to a lawyer

  • Your injury may be more than a threshold injury and fault will decide damages
  • Fault is split between several drivers and no insurer will take the claim
  • A fault decision has been made and the review deadline is running
  • No driver seems to be at fault and you've been told you can't claim

You may not need one

  • Your question is about treatment, not about who caused the crash
  • You mainly need a doctor to record your injuries
  • You only need help identifying the at-fault vehicle's insurer

If what you need now is treatment, start there. Ask us about doctors and allied health, such as GPs, physiotherapists and psychologists, who understand CTP claims and the Certificate of Fitness.

Not quite your situation?

Frequently asked questions

Ready to talk it through?

Get a free, no-obligation claim check. It's the first step toward understanding where your claim stands and what help it needs.

CTP Lawyer is not a law firm. This page is general information, not legal advice; the independent lawyer you speak with can advise on your own situation.

Call now(02) 7238 7379Free claim check