Newcastle & the Hunter · Car accident lawyer help

Car accident lawyer, Blacksmiths: who was at fault?

Free, by phone or online. We tell you honestly whether a fault question needs a lawyer.

A rear-end crash in traffic, a collision at an intersection, a lane change that went wrong: around Blacksmiths, as anywhere in NSW, the injury claim usually goes to the insurer of the vehicle at fault. When that is obvious, many people never need a lawyer. When the drivers disagree or the insurer says you contributed, advice is often worth having. Our free check helps you tell which situation you're in.

Postcode: 2281

  • Free claim check, no obligation
  • By phone & online, no office to visit
  • Helping people in Blacksmiths & Marks Point

Blacksmiths: local roads, hospitals and evidence of fault

Nelson Bay Road, the Pacific Highway and the Newcastle Inner City Bypass carry heavy local traffic. If the insurer says you contributed to a crash there, ask how it reached its percentage. If you were taken to Belmont Hospital, the ambulance and emergency records often note the type of impact, such as being hit from behind or side-on. That early description can support your version of how the crash happened. Traffic slows for pick-ups, bus stops and people crossing. A low-speed collision in that setting can still raise real questions about who should have given way, so note what each vehicle was doing.

Region
Newcastle & the Hunter
Postcode
2281
Main roads
Pacific Highway
Nearest public hospital
Belmont Hospital

The first hours after a crash, and the question of fault

Once everyone is safe and anyone hurt has help, your memory of the crash is at its sharpest. Note which lane each car was in, what the lights or signs showed, roughly how fast you were going and where the vehicles came to rest. Write down anything the other driver said about how it happened. These details can decide fault later, and they fade within days.

  • What the traffic lights or give-way signs showed
  • Names and phone numbers of anyone who saw it
  • Whether you and your passengers wore seatbelts
  • Weather, light and the road surface at the time

Read next:What to do after a car accident in NSW

What fault changes in your claim

Think of the claim in two parts. Statutory benefits come first and, for most people, don't depend on who caused the crash. Common law damages come later and depend heavily on it: another driver must have been at fault, you must not have been mostly at fault, and the injury must be more than a threshold injury. That is why fault is worth attention early.

Rules change

Your accident date decides which rules apply. Accidents before 1 December 2017 fall under the older 1999 Act, and some limits changed again on 1 April 2023.

Read next:At fault vs not at fault

Fault and your claim: four situations

Fault rarely decides whether you can claim at all. Most injured people get statutory benefits whoever caused the crash. What fault changes is how long those benefits can run and whether a lump sum is possible. These four positions cover most car accidents.

  1. Situation 1

    You were not at fault

    If another driver caused the crash, their vehicle's CTP insurer deals with your claim. Having no share of the blame keeps the most options open, including a later damages claim where the injury goes beyond the threshold.

  2. Situation 2

    You were partly at fault

    Partial fault is common and usually a question of degree. A finding of contributory negligence can lower weekly payments beyond 52 weeks and reduce damages, so the percentage the insurer picks is worth checking.

  3. Situation 3

    You were wholly or mostly at fault

    'Mostly at fault' means contributory negligence greater than 61%. Weekly payments and treatment and care are then generally limited to the first 52 weeks, with no common law damages. Children 16 and under keep treatment and care for as long as they need it.

  4. Situation 4

    No one was clearly at fault

    When a crash was nobody's fault, the claim isn't necessarily over. Under the 'blameless accident' rules, an injured person may be able to claim as if someone were at fault. Whether they apply depends on the facts.

General information, not legal advice. Fault and contributory negligence are decided on the evidence. Time limits apply.

A man working on a laptop at an outdoor cafe table

Free claim check

Car crash near Blacksmiths? Free fault check

Tell us what happened and what the insurer has said about fault. We'll point you to the right help, whether that's a lawyer, a doctor or neither.

Free · No obligation

If you were the passenger

Being a passenger doesn't make fault irrelevant. It shifts the question to the drivers. If the driver of your car and another driver both contributed, your claim may involve both vehicles' insurers. Your own conduct can still come up in limited ways, such as not wearing a seatbelt or travelling with a driver you knew was affected by alcohol.

Many passengers hesitate to claim because the driver was someone close to them. It helps to know the claim is made against the CTP insurer, which exists for exactly this situation. The driver may be asked for their account, and any fault finding affects their own claim, not your right to make yours. Talk it through if you're worried about how it will land.

Read next:Passenger injury claims

Dashcam, witnesses and the police record

An independent witness, someone with no link to either driver, can carry real weight. Get their name and phone number at the scene if you can. If you can't, the police record may have their details. Photos of the final positions of the vehicles also matter, since damage patterns often show the angle and order of impact.

Your own account matters too, and consistency is what gives it weight. Write down what happened soon after the crash and keep that note. When you later describe the crash to a doctor, the insurer or a lawyer, tell it the same way. Differences between early and later accounts are one of the first things an insurer looks for.

  • Dashcam footage, saved as the original file
  • The police event number and any police record
  • Camera footage from nearby shops or homes
  • Any messages the other driver sent after the crash

Save footage early

Many dashcams loop and record over older files. Copy the crash footage to another device straight away, and keep the original file untouched.

If the insurer says you contributed

Contributory negligence means you are found to have contributed to the crash or to your own injuries. Common examples are not wearing a seatbelt, speeding, or travelling with a driver you knew had been drinking. It doesn't usually stop a claim. It can reduce weekly payments after 52 weeks and reduce damages, and above 61% you are treated as mostly at fault.

Check the percentage

A contributory negligence finding is usually expressed as a percentage. A few points either side of the 'mostly at fault' line can decide whether damages are possible at all, so ask how the figure was worked out.

Read next:Can I claim if I was partly at fault?

Whose insurer, when fault is shared or unclear

In a two-car crash, the injury claim usually goes to the CTP insurer of the car at fault, which is your own vehicle's insurer if you caused it. When fault is shared or unclear, the insurers may not agree at first. That shouldn't hold up your claim. Lodge with the insurer that fits the evidence you have, and let the fault question be worked out as the claim proceeds.

If you were hit from behind and pushed into the car in front, you may have been blameless in both impacts. Make that clear in your account: which impact came first, and whether you had stopped before being hit. Insurers sometimes treat a chain crash as one event, and the sequence is what shows your own share was nil.

Read next:Multi-vehicle accidents

When fault is disputed

If the other driver says you caused the crash, or the insurer won't accept that the other driver did, the evidence decides it. This is the point where an independent lawyer is often worth talking to. They can test the insurer's reasons, gather what's missing and advise whether to ask for a review. Insurers make decisions under the scheme rules, and those decisions can be challenged.

Read next:At-fault self-check

Do you need a lawyer for a fault question?

Plenty of car accident claims never involve a fault argument. The ones that do often benefit from advice, because fault controls the lump sum. These lists show when a lawyer is commonly worth a call on fault, and when you may manage alone.

Often worth talking to a lawyer

  • A fault decision has been made and the review deadline is running
  • You were a passenger and both drivers blame each other
  • The insurer puts your share of fault above 61%
  • The other driver's insurer says you caused the crash

You may not need one

  • Your question is about treatment, not about who caused the crash
  • You only need help identifying the at-fault vehicle's insurer
  • You were a passenger and nobody disputes which driver caused it

Fault may be the legal question, but your injuries are the heart of the claim. We can point you to doctors and allied health who work with CTP claims, including the Certificate of Fitness the insurer needs.

Not quite your situation?

Frequently asked questions

Ready to talk it through?

Get a free, no-obligation claim check. It's the first step toward understanding where your claim stands and what help it needs.

CTP Lawyer is not a law firm. This page is general information, not legal advice; the independent lawyer you speak with can advise on your own situation.

Call now(02) 7238 7379Free claim check