Northern Rivers & Clarence · Car accident lawyer help

Alstonville car accident lawyer: when fault is argued

Plain answers on shared blame, seatbelt arguments and disputed fault, then the right help for your claim.

You don't have to prove fault on the day of the crash, but what you notice then can matter later. Lanes, signals, where the cars stopped and what was said all feed into the insurer's view. For people in Alstonville, we explain how fault is weighed in a NSW claim and help you decide whether the question needs a lawyer. Often it doesn't. When it does, we'll connect you with one.

Postcode: 2477

  • Free claim check, no obligation
  • By phone & online, no office to visit
  • Helping people in Alstonville & Wollongbar

Local context for a fault question in Alstonville

The Pacific Highway, the Bruxner Highway and the Summerland Way link the Northern Rivers. If the crash happened over the border in Queensland, Queensland's scheme generally applies instead, so be precise about where it was. Hospitals serving the area include Ballina Hospital. Wherever you were first seen, describe the crash accurately and consistently. Insurers compare early medical notes with later accounts when they decide who caused a collision. Traffic slows for pick-ups, bus stops and people crossing. A low-speed collision in that setting can still raise real questions about who should have given way, so note what each vehicle was doing.

Region
Northern Rivers & Clarence
Postcode
2477
Main roads
Bruxner Highway
Nearest public hospital
Ballina Hospital

What to note near Alstonville that bears on fault

Once everyone is safe and anyone hurt has help, your memory of the crash is at its sharpest. Note which lane each car was in, what the lights or signs showed, roughly how fast you were going and where the vehicles came to rest. Write down anything the other driver said about how it happened. These details can decide fault later, and they fade within days.

  • The lane each vehicle was in, and any lane change
  • Names and phone numbers of anyone who saw it
  • Exactly what the other driver said, written down that day
  • Weather, light and the road surface at the time

Read next:What to do after a car accident in NSW

Fault, statutory benefits and damages

Think of the claim in two parts. Statutory benefits come first and, for most people, don't depend on who caused the crash. Common law damages come later and depend heavily on it: another driver must have been at fault, you must not have been mostly at fault, and the injury must be more than a threshold injury. That is why fault is worth attention early.

Rules change

Your accident date decides which rules apply. Accidents before 1 December 2017 fall under the older 1999 Act, and some limits changed again on 1 April 2023.

Read next:At fault vs not at fault

Where fault leaves your claim: four common positions

Fault rarely decides whether you can claim at all. Most injured people get statutory benefits whoever caused the crash. What fault changes is how long those benefits can run and whether a lump sum is possible. These four positions cover most car accidents.

  1. Situation 1

    You were not at fault

    If another driver caused the crash, their vehicle's CTP insurer deals with your claim. Having no share of the blame keeps the most options open, including a later damages claim where the injury goes beyond the threshold.

  2. Situation 2

    You were partly at fault

    Partial fault is common and usually a question of degree. A finding of contributory negligence can lower weekly payments beyond 52 weeks and reduce damages, so the percentage the insurer picks is worth checking.

  3. Situation 3

    You were wholly or mostly at fault

    For accidents from 1 April 2023, a driver found wholly or mostly at fault generally still receives statutory benefits for the first 52 weeks, but cannot claim damages. A child aged 16 or under at the time is still covered for the treatment and care they need, however long that is.

  4. Situation 4

    No one was clearly at fault

    Some crashes happen without any driver being at fault, for example after a sudden medical episode or an unforeseeable mechanical failure. NSW has 'blameless accident' rules that may let an injured person claim in some of these cases. They are technical, so get advice.

General information, not legal advice. Fault and contributory negligence are decided on the evidence. Time limits apply.

An older man and a younger woman working through something together on a laptop at home

Free claim check

Not sure where fault leaves you? Ask us

Free and no obligation. Call (02) 7238 7379 or send a few details online, and we'll help you work out where fault leaves your claim.

Free · No obligation

If the insurer says you contributed

Contributory negligence means you are found to have contributed to the crash or to your own injuries. Common examples are not wearing a seatbelt, speeding, or travelling with a driver you knew had been drinking. It doesn't usually stop a claim. It can reduce weekly payments after 52 weeks and reduce damages, and above 61% you are treated as mostly at fault.

Check the percentage

A contributory negligence finding is usually expressed as a percentage. A few points either side of the 'mostly at fault' line can decide whether damages are possible at all, so ask how the figure was worked out.

Read next:Can I claim if I was partly at fault?

Several vehicles, several insurers: working out fault

When three or more vehicles are involved, fault can be divided between several drivers. That affects which insurer deals with you and may affect how any damages are shared between insurers later. It generally doesn't stop you receiving statutory benefits while that is argued. If the insurers are still disputing it weeks after you lodge, advice is worth getting.

Passengers and drivers caught in the middle of a chain crash often feel stuck between insurers. Your claim generally shouldn't stall while the insurers sort out their shares. Keep a note of every call, who you spoke to and what they said. If no insurer will take responsibility, that is a good moment to ask for advice.

Read next:Multi-vehicle accidents

Passengers: why the fault question is usually about the drivers

Passengers usually have the simplest fault position of anyone in a crash. You weren't in control, so the question is only which driver caused it, and that decides which insurer deals with you. Where both drivers share the blame, you may still be blameless yourself. That matters later, because damages depend partly on your own share of fault.

Passengers in a crash between two cars sometimes find that each driver blames the other and neither insurer will accept the claim at first. You don't have to take sides. Give an honest account of what you saw, lodge on time, and let the fault question be worked out between the insurers. If it stalls, that's when advice helps most.

Read next:Passenger injury claims

Evidence that settles fault

Dashcam footage is often the clearest evidence of fault, but many cameras record over themselves within hours or days. Save the original file as soon as you can, and don't trim or edit it. If another driver or a nearby business may have footage, ask early and in writing, because it may not be kept for long.

Some evidence only exists for a short time: skid marks, debris, temporary signs and camera footage. Other evidence can be gathered later, such as the police record and witness statements. If fault is disputed, a lawyer can ask for footage and records to be kept and, where the claim justifies it, obtain an expert opinion on how the crash happened.

  • Dashcam footage, saved as the original file
  • The police event number and any police record
  • Photos of both vehicles' damage and final positions
  • Independent witnesses' names and numbers

Save footage early

Many dashcams loop and record over older files. Copy the crash footage to another device straight away, and keep the original file untouched.

When fault is disputed

A fault finding isn't final just because the insurer has made it. Most insurer decisions can go to internal review, generally within 28 days of receiving the decision, and then to the Personal Injury Commission. Before you accept a finding that you were mostly at fault, have someone look at whether the evidence supports it, because so much turns on that line.

Read next:At-fault self-check

Do you need a lawyer for a fault question?

Plenty of car accident claims never involve a fault argument. The ones that do often benefit from advice, because fault controls the lump sum. These lists show when a lawyer is commonly worth a call on fault, and when you may manage alone.

Often worth talking to a lawyer

  • Fault is split between several drivers and no insurer will take the claim
  • You've been asked for a detailed statement about how the crash happened
  • A seatbelt or speed argument is being used to cut your claim
  • A fault decision has been made and the review deadline is running

You may not need one

  • It was a clear rear-end collision and liability is accepted
  • You only need help identifying the at-fault vehicle's insurer
  • You were a passenger and nobody disputes which driver caused it

Before any fault argument, get the right care. We can connect you with doctors and allied health experienced with CTP claims, who can treat you and complete a clear Certificate of Fitness whatever happens with fault.

Not quite your situation?

Frequently asked questions

Ready to talk it through?

Get a free, no-obligation claim check. It's the first step toward understanding where your claim stands and what help it needs.

CTP Lawyer is not a law firm. This page is general information, not legal advice; the independent lawyer you speak with can advise on your own situation.

Call now(02) 7238 7379Free claim check