Peats Ridge injury compensation lawyer: serious injuries

An injury can be serious in human terms and still sit on the threshold side of the line, and the reverse can happen too. That can feel unfair. It helps to know the scheme's tests are about the type of injury and its lasting effects, not how much you've suffered. Knowing which test applies lets you and your doctors focus on the evidence that matters.

The scheme treats psychological injury seriously, but it still sorts it by diagnosis. A threshold psychological injury is generally handled like a threshold physical one. A more serious diagnosed condition may take the claim beyond the threshold. Because the difference turns on the diagnosis, the opinion of a treating psychiatrist or psychologist can matter a great deal.

The definition works by exclusion. An injury is generally threshold if it is soft tissue damage with no nerve damage and no torn tendon, ligament, meniscus or cartilage, whether the tear is complete or not, or if it is a psychological injury the scheme classes as threshold. Injuries outside that description, such as fractures, torn ligaments or brain injuries, are generally more than threshold.

The line also decides whether common law damages are open. With only a threshold injury, they generally aren't. With a more serious injury, you may be able to claim damages if another driver was at fault and you weren't mostly at fault. That is why a threshold decision is often the most important decision the insurer makes about a serious injury.

Earning capacity compares what you could have earned without the injury with what you can realistically earn now. For a tradesperson with a damaged shoulder, or an office worker with a brain injury, that gap can be large and long-lasting. Record every change to your working life: hours, duties, roles you can no longer do. Those facts sit alongside the medical evidence.

There's usually no single moment when WPI is measured. Opinions may come from treating doctors, from doctors the insurer arranges, and, where the two sides disagree, from a medical assessment through the Personal Injury Commission. Timing matters, because injuries can improve or worsen for months. A lawyer can advise whether an assessment is premature before you rely on it.

• Whether the injury has stabilised
• Scans or tests your doctors have ordered
• Whether you disagree with the result, and the deadline to say so

Whole person impairment, or WPI, is a percentage that describes how much a lasting injury affects the body as a whole. It isn't a measure of pain, and it isn't a measure of what you've lost. It's a medical assessment made under set guidelines once an injury has stabilised. In a CTP claim, WPI matters mainly for damages: non-economic loss is only available where WPI is more than 10%.

It's easy to overstate the 10% line. You don't need more than 10% WPI to claim damages for past and future loss of earnings; you need an injury that's more than threshold, another driver at fault, and not to have been mostly at fault yourself. The 10% line decides pain and suffering, and it also affects some timing rules for a damages claim.

The most persuasive serious injury claims usually have consistent evidence: the same injuries described the same way, from the hospital to the GP to specialists, with no unexplained gaps in treatment. That consistency comes from telling each doctor the full story and following treatment plans. If a report leaves something out, ask the doctor about it rather than letting it pass.

• Imaging reports, such as X-ray, CT or MRI, where done
• Operation and specialist reports
• Every Certificate of Fitness, in order
• Any impairment assessment, and your response to it