Cheltenham: when you might need an injury compensation lawyer

An injury can be serious in human terms and still sit on the threshold side of the line, and the reverse can happen too. That can feel unfair. It helps to know the scheme's tests are about the type of injury and its lasting effects, not how much you've suffered. Knowing which test applies lets you and your doctors focus on the evidence that matters.

A serious injury can change more than the next few months of work. It can limit the kind of work you can do for years, or permanently. In a damages claim, that is called loss of future earning capacity, and it can be a significant part of a serious injury claim. It generally needs evidence from your doctors, your work history and sometimes vocational experts.

Whole person impairment, or WPI, is a percentage that describes how much a lasting injury affects the body as a whole. It isn't a measure of pain, and it isn't a measure of what you've lost. It's a medical assessment made under set guidelines once an injury has stabilised. In a CTP claim, WPI matters mainly for damages: non-economic loss is only available where WPI is more than 10%.

An assessment above 10% opens damages for non-economic loss and changes some timing rules as well. But many people with genuine, lasting injuries are assessed at 10% or less. That doesn't mean the injury isn't real, or that there is no damages claim. Economic loss, such as lost earning capacity, can still be claimed where the other conditions are met.

Impairment is generally assessed once an injury has stabilised, meaning it's unlikely to change much with further treatment. Assessing too early can understate a serious injury. The insurer may arrange an assessment, your own doctors may give opinions, and if the insurer and you disagree about the degree of impairment, the Personal Injury Commission can carry out a medical assessment.

• Whether every injured body part is included
• How complete and current your medical records are
• Whether you disagree with the result, and the deadline to say so

The scheme treats psychological injury seriously, but it still sorts it by diagnosis. A threshold psychological injury is generally handled like a threshold physical one. A more serious diagnosed condition may take the claim beyond the threshold. Because the difference turns on the diagnosis, the opinion of a treating psychiatrist or psychologist can matter a great deal.

From 1 April 2023, the scheme uses the term threshold injury, which replaced the old term minor injury. A threshold injury is generally a soft tissue injury, a threshold psychological injury, or both. Soft tissue here means muscles, tendons, ligaments and similar tissue. Nerve damage is excluded, and so is a full or partial tear of a tendon, ligament, meniscus or cartilage.

The line also decides whether common law damages are open. With only a threshold injury, they generally aren't. With a more serious injury, you may be able to claim damages if another driver was at fault and you weren't mostly at fault. That is why a threshold decision is often the most important decision the insurer makes about a serious injury.

The most persuasive serious injury claims usually have consistent evidence: the same injuries described the same way, from the hospital to the GP to specialists, with no unexplained gaps in treatment. That consistency comes from telling each doctor the full story and following treatment plans. If a report leaves something out, ask the doctor about it rather than letting it pass.

• Operation and specialist reports
• Every Certificate of Fitness, in order
• Reports from a treating psychologist or psychiatrist, if any
• Any impairment assessment, and your response to it