Carlingford injury compensation lawyer: serious injuries

An injury can be serious in human terms and still sit on the threshold side of the line, and the reverse can happen too. That can feel unfair. It helps to know the scheme's tests are about the type of injury and its lasting effects, not how much you've suffered. Knowing which test applies lets you and your doctors focus on the evidence that matters.

Whole person impairment, or WPI, is a percentage that describes how much a lasting injury affects the body as a whole. It isn't a measure of pain, and it isn't a measure of what you've lost. It's a medical assessment made under set guidelines once an injury has stabilised. In a CTP claim, WPI matters mainly for damages: non-economic loss is only available where WPI is more than 10%.

It's easy to overstate the 10% line. You don't need more than 10% WPI to claim damages for past and future loss of earnings; you need an injury that's more than threshold, another driver at fault, and not to have been mostly at fault yourself. The 10% line decides pain and suffering, and it also affects some timing rules for a damages claim.

The scheme treats psychological injury seriously, but it still sorts it by diagnosis. A threshold psychological injury is generally handled like a threshold physical one. A more serious diagnosed condition may take the claim beyond the threshold. Because the difference turns on the diagnosis, the opinion of a treating psychiatrist or psychologist can matter a great deal.

Earning capacity compares what you could have earned without the injury with what you can realistically earn now. For a tradesperson with a damaged shoulder, or an office worker with a brain injury, that gap can be large and long-lasting. Record every change to your working life: hours, duties, roles you can no longer do. Those facts sit alongside the medical evidence.

The threshold line is a medical line drawn by legal rules. Your doctor diagnoses the injury; the scheme's definition decides which side it falls on. Sprains, strains and whiplash without nerve findings usually sit on the threshold side. Confirmed nerve damage, a tear, a fracture or a brain injury generally takes an injury beyond it. The insurer makes the call, and you can challenge it.

Getting the classification right early helps. If you have symptoms that could point to nerve involvement or a tear, such as numbness, weakness, locking or a joint giving way, describe them to your doctor. Whether tests are needed is a medical decision. If a diagnosis changes, make sure the insurer has the new evidence, because the classification may need to change with it.

In a serious injury claim, impairment often comes into focus well after the crash, once treatment has run its course. The Personal Injury Commission handles medical assessment where the insurer and the injured person disagree. If you think an assessment is wrong, the steps to challenge it are set out separately, and the deadlines are short, so act promptly.

• Whether every injured body part is included
• Scans or tests your doctors have ordered
• Whether you disagree with the result, and the deadline to say so

The most persuasive serious injury claims usually have consistent evidence: the same injuries described the same way, from the hospital to the GP to specialists, with no unexplained gaps in treatment. That consistency comes from telling each doctor the full story and following treatment plans. If a report leaves something out, ask the doctor about it rather than letting it pass.

• Imaging reports, such as X-ray, CT or MRI, where done
• Every Certificate of Fitness, in order
• Reports from a treating psychologist or psychiatrist, if any
• Records of how the injury affects your work