Koolewong: next steps for a refused CTP claim

A decision you disagree with is a reason to act, not to give up. Start with the reasons in the letter. Some refusals turn on missing information you can supply. Others turn on a legal question, such as fault or the threshold definition, where advice helps. Either way, the review path is open for most decisions.

Some decisions come up again and again. A claim may be refused because it was lodged late, or limited because the insurer says the injury is threshold or that you were mostly at fault. Weekly payments may stop, or a treatment request may be declined. Each raises its own evidence questions, and each can generally be reviewed.

• You were found wholly or mostly at fault
• The crash is being treated as a work injury
• Weekly payments were stopped or reduced
• A treatment request was declined

An internal review is a fresh look at the decision by the insurer. Ask in writing, generally within 28 days of receiving the decision. Say which decision you disagree with, why you think it's wrong and what outcome you want. Attach anything new: a report from your doctor, hospital records, payslips or witness details.

Don't wait until the last days of the window to start. Specialist reports and records can take time to arrive, and a rushed request is usually weaker. If some evidence won't be ready in time, lodge the request within the deadline anyway and tell the insurer what else is on its way.

The Personal Injury Commission, or PIC, is an independent tribunal that started on 1 March 2021. In the CTP scheme it handles merit review, medical assessment, miscellaneous claims assessment and claims assessment of damages claims. It replaced the older dispute bodies, so older material that sends you elsewhere is out of date.

It helps to keep a dispute and a complaint apart. If the problem is the outcome, use internal review and then the Personal Injury Commission. If the problem is the way the insurer is handling your claim, the Independent Review Office can take a complaint. Sometimes both apply, and it's fine to use each path for a different part of the problem.

A threshold decision about a psychological injury can be disputed like any other. If the insurer has classified yours as threshold and your treating practitioner disagrees, their written opinion is the starting point for an internal review. If the review doesn't resolve it, the dispute can go on to medical assessment at the Personal Injury Commission, where the 28-day window for a certificate review applies.

Because some disputes don't allow legal costs to be recovered, it's worth asking early whether paying for help makes sense in yours. For a straightforward review, you may manage alone with good evidence. For a threshold dispute that affects a damages claim, or a refusal of the whole claim, advice is more often worth it.