Inner West · Car accident lawyer help

Car accident lawyer help for people in St Peters

Not every fault question needs a lawyer. The free check tells you whether yours does.

Being partly to blame for a car accident usually reduces a claim rather than ending it. Being found mostly at fault is different, and the line between the two is worth understanding. People from St Peters can use our free check by phone or online to see which side of that line the evidence points to, and whether a lawyer's view would help before you accept the insurer's position.

Postcode: 2044

  • Free claim check, no obligation
  • By phone & online, no office to visit
  • Helping people in St Peters & Sydenham

Where fault leaves your claim: four common positions

People often assume that being at fault means getting nothing. That isn't how the NSW scheme generally works. The four situations below show what usually changes as your share of the blame goes up.

  1. Situation 1

    You were not at fault

    Your claim goes to the CTP insurer of the vehicle that caused the crash. You can receive statutory benefits, and if your injury is more than a threshold injury, a common law damages claim may also be open to you.

  2. Situation 2

    You were partly at fault

    Partial fault is common and usually a question of degree. A finding of contributory negligence can lower weekly payments beyond 52 weeks and reduce damages, so the percentage the insurer picks is worth checking.

  3. Situation 3

    You were wholly or mostly at fault

    For accidents from 1 April 2023, a driver found wholly or mostly at fault generally still receives statutory benefits for the first 52 weeks, but cannot claim damages. A child aged 16 or under at the time is still covered for the treatment and care they need, however long that is.

  4. Situation 4

    No one was clearly at fault

    When a crash was nobody's fault, the claim isn't necessarily over. Under the 'blameless accident' rules, an injured person may be able to claim as if someone were at fault. Whether they apply depends on the facts.

General information, not legal advice. Fault and contributory negligence are decided on the evidence. Time limits apply.

St Peters roads and the question of fault

Parramatta Road, City West Link and Victoria Road are stop-start for much of the day, and the WestConnex interchanges add complex merges. Rear-end crashes here can still end in an argument about sudden braking. Whether the crash was on the Princes Highway or a quiet side street, fault is decided on the evidence as a whole. Skid marks, damage patterns and the final positions of the cars can say more than either driver's account. Public hospitals serving the area include Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and St George Hospital. Ambulance and emergency notes usually record how the crash was described on the day, which can matter if the other driver's account changes later.

With St Peters station and bus stops on Princes Highway nearby, buses and other commercial vehicles are a regular part of local traffic. Many carry cameras, so if one was involved in your crash, ask early whether the footage was kept.

Region
Inner West
Postcode
2044
Main roads
Princes Highway · Campbell Road
Nearest public hospital
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Getting around
St Peters station · bus stops on Princes Highway

A car accident lawyer for fault: when it helps

A lawyer isn't a box to tick after every crash. When fault is clear and accepted, many people run their own claim. When it's argued, split or pinned on you, advice is often worth having.

Often worth talking to a lawyer

  • You've been asked for a detailed statement about how the crash happened
  • Your injury may be more than a threshold injury and fault will decide damages
  • A seatbelt or speed argument is being used to cut your claim
  • Fault is split between several drivers and no insurer will take the claim

You may not need one

  • Your question is about treatment, not about who caused the crash
  • You mainly need a doctor to record your injuries
  • It was a clear rear-end collision and liability is accepted

Before any fault argument, get the right care. We can connect you with doctors and allied health experienced with CTP claims, who can treat you and complete a clear Certificate of Fitness whatever happens with fault.

Not quite your situation?

The first hours after a crash, and the question of fault

Fault arguments are built from small details. Before the cars are moved, if it is safe, photograph where each one stopped and the damage to each. Look for skid marks, debris and the traffic signals. Then write a short account in your own words: where you were going, what you saw, and when you first noticed the other vehicle. Keep it factual and keep it.

  • The lane each vehicle was in, and any lane change
  • Where each car came to rest, photographed before moving if safe
  • Skid marks, debris and the damage to each vehicle
  • Exactly what the other driver said, written down that day

Read next:What to do after a car accident in NSW

Passengers: why the fault question is usually about the drivers

Being a passenger doesn't make fault irrelevant. It shifts the question to the drivers. If the driver of your car and another driver both contributed, your claim may involve both vehicles' insurers. Your own conduct can still come up in limited ways, such as not wearing a seatbelt or travelling with a driver you knew was affected by alcohol.

Children in the car are in a special position. Whoever caused the crash, a child aged 16 or under at the time can keep receiving treatment and care for as long as they need it. Usually a parent or guardian lodges the claim for them. Fault can still matter for other entitlements, so keep the police record with the child's medical records.

Read next:Passenger injury claims

An older man and a younger woman working through something together on a laptop at home

Free claim check

Not sure where fault leaves you? Ask us

Tell us what happened and what the insurer has said about fault. We'll point you to the right help, whether that's a lawyer, a doctor or neither.

Free · No obligation

Seatbelts, speed and your share of fault

A seatbelt argument is the classic example. If the insurer says your injuries were worse because you weren't belted in, it may reduce what you receive. The percentage isn't set by a formula. It's argued on the evidence, including medical opinion about how each injury happened, which makes it worth checking rather than simply accepting.

Check the percentage

A contributory negligence finding is usually expressed as a percentage. A few points either side of the 'mostly at fault' line can decide whether damages are possible at all, so ask how the figure was worked out.

Read next:Can I claim if I was partly at fault?

What fault changes in your claim

Think of the claim in two parts. Statutory benefits come first and, for most people, don't depend on who caused the crash. Common law damages come later and depend heavily on it: another driver must have been at fault, you must not have been mostly at fault, and the injury must be more than a threshold injury. That is why fault is worth attention early.

Rules change

Your accident date decides which rules apply. Accidents before 1 December 2017 fall under the older 1999 Act, and some limits changed again on 1 April 2023.

Read next:At fault vs not at fault

Several vehicles, several insurers: working out fault

In a two-car crash, the injury claim usually goes to the CTP insurer of the car at fault, which is your own vehicle's insurer if you caused it. When fault is shared or unclear, the insurers may not agree at first. That shouldn't hold up your claim. Lodge with the insurer that fits the evidence you have, and let the fault question be worked out as the claim proceeds.

Passengers and drivers caught in the middle of a chain crash often feel stuck between insurers. Your claim generally shouldn't stall while the insurers sort out their shares. Keep a note of every call, who you spoke to and what they said. If no insurer will take responsibility, that is a good moment to ask for advice.

Read next:Multi-vehicle accidents

Evidence that settles fault

Fault is decided on evidence, not on who sounds more certain. The usual pieces are the police event number and any police record, photos of where the cars stopped, the damage to each vehicle, dashcam footage and independent witnesses. No single piece is always decisive. Together they usually show what happened, even when the drivers tell different stories.

Some evidence only exists for a short time: skid marks, debris, temporary signs and camera footage. Other evidence can be gathered later, such as the police record and witness statements. If fault is disputed, a lawyer can ask for footage and records to be kept and, where the claim justifies it, obtain an expert opinion on how the crash happened.

  • The police event number and any police record
  • Independent witnesses' names and numbers
  • Photos of signals, signs and lane markings
  • Any messages the other driver sent after the crash

Save footage early

Shops, buses and homes with cameras often keep footage only briefly. Ask in writing as soon as you can, giving the date, time and exact spot.

When fault is disputed

If the other driver says you caused the crash, or the insurer won't accept that the other driver did, the evidence decides it. This is the point where an independent lawyer is often worth talking to. They can test the insurer's reasons, gather what's missing and advise whether to ask for a review. Insurers make decisions under the scheme rules, and those decisions can be challenged.

Read next:At-fault self-check

Frequently asked questions

Ready to talk it through?

Get a free, no-obligation claim check. It's the first step toward understanding where your claim stands and what help it needs.

CTP Lawyer is not a law firm. This page is general information, not legal advice; the independent lawyer you speak with can advise on your own situation.

Call now(02) 7238 7379Free claim check