Inner West · Car accident lawyer help

Enfield South car accident lawyer: when fault is argued

Fault rarely stops a claim, but it can shorten benefits and close off a lump sum. We help you see where you stand.

Drivers and passengers hurt in a crash near Enfield South often hear early on who the insurer thinks caused it. That view can be wrong, and it can be challenged. Fault is decided on evidence such as police records, photos, footage and witnesses, not on who apologised or who sounded more certain. We are not a law firm. We check where your claim stands and connect you with an independent lawyer when fault is genuinely in dispute.

Postcode: 2133

  • Free claim check, no obligation
  • By phone & online, no office to visit
  • Helping people in Enfield South & Enfield

Local context for a fault question in Enfield South

At intersections on Liverpool Road, Concord Road or Homebush Bay Drive, turning arrows and changing lights often decide fault. A photo of the signals taken soon after the crash can settle who should have given way. Hospitals serving the area include Canterbury Hospital. Wherever you were first seen, describe the crash accurately and consistently. Insurers compare early medical notes with later accounts when they decide who caused a collision. Around bus stops for Strathfield and Burwood, traffic slows for pick-ups, bus stops and people crossing. A low-speed collision in that setting can still raise real questions about who should have given way, so note what each vehicle was doing.

Region
Inner West
Postcode
2133
Main roads
Liverpool Road · Punchbowl Road
Nearest public hospital
Canterbury Hospital
Getting around
bus services to Strathfield and Burwood

At the scene: what to notice for fault

Once everyone is safe and anyone hurt has help, your memory of the crash is at its sharpest. Note which lane each car was in, what the lights or signs showed, roughly how fast you were going and where the vehicles came to rest. Write down anything the other driver said about how it happened. These details can decide fault later, and they fade within days.

  • Skid marks, debris and the damage to each vehicle
  • Names and phone numbers of anyone who saw it
  • Exactly what the other driver said, written down that day
  • Whether you and your passengers wore seatbelts

Read next:What to do after a car accident in NSW

Why fault matters more for a lump sum than for benefits

Think of the claim in two parts. Statutory benefits come first and, for most people, don't depend on who caused the crash. Common law damages come later and depend heavily on it: another driver must have been at fault, you must not have been mostly at fault, and the injury must be more than a threshold injury. That is why fault is worth attention early.

Rules change

The fault rules and benefit limits described here apply to accidents from 1 April 2023. Earlier accidents can have different limits, so check the rules for your accident date.

Read next:At fault vs not at fault

Where fault leaves your claim: four common positions

People often assume that being at fault means getting nothing. That isn't how the NSW scheme generally works. The four situations below show what usually changes as your share of the blame goes up.

  1. Situation 1

    You were not at fault

    No share of the fault is the strongest position. Benefits come from the at-fault vehicle's insurer, and a lump sum damages claim may follow if your injury isn't a threshold injury. The insurer still needs evidence before it accepts fault.

  2. Situation 2

    You were partly at fault

    Sharing some of the blame generally doesn't stop a claim. It can reduce weekly payments after the first 52 weeks and cut down any damages in proportion. How much is often argued, which is where advice helps.

  3. Situation 3

    You were wholly or mostly at fault

    'Mostly at fault' means contributory negligence greater than 61%. Weekly payments and treatment and care are then generally limited to the first 52 weeks, with no common law damages. Children 16 and under keep treatment and care for as long as they need it.

  4. Situation 4

    No one was clearly at fault

    When a crash was nobody's fault, the claim isn't necessarily over. Under the 'blameless accident' rules, an injured person may be able to claim as if someone were at fault. Whether they apply depends on the facts.

General information, not legal advice. Fault and contributory negligence are decided on the evidence. Time limits apply.

A man in a jacket reading through a sheaf of papers on a sofa

Free claim check

Talk through who caused the crash

Tell us what happened and what the insurer has said about fault. We'll point you to the right help, whether that's a lawyer, a doctor or neither.

Free · No obligation

Whose insurer, when fault is shared or unclear

Chain collisions are where fault gets complicated. The driver who started it may carry most of the blame, but a driver behind who was following too closely can share it. Each vehicle has its own Green Slip insurer. Your task is to record every vehicle involved and the order of the impacts; the insurers' task is to sort out which of them responds.

If you were hit from behind and pushed into the car in front, you may have been blameless in both impacts. Make that clear in your account: which impact came first, and whether you had stopped before being hit. Insurers sometimes treat a chain crash as one event, and the sequence is what shows your own share was nil.

Read next:Multi-vehicle accidents

Evidence that settles fault

An independent witness, someone with no link to either driver, can carry real weight. Get their name and phone number at the scene if you can. If you can't, the police record may have their details. Photos of the final positions of the vehicles also matter, since damage patterns often show the angle and order of impact.

The police event number links your claim to the official record of the crash. The insurer can use it to check who was involved and what was reported. It's worth getting even if the crash seemed minor and police didn't attend, because a record made close to the time is harder to dispute than one pieced together later.

  • Dashcam footage, saved as the original file
  • Your own written account from the first days
  • Photos of signals, signs and lane markings
  • Any messages the other driver sent after the crash

Save footage early

Many dashcams loop and record over older files. Copy the crash footage to another device straight away, and keep the original file untouched.

Passengers and fault

A passenger isn't driving, so a passenger is rarely found at fault for the crash itself. The claim goes to the CTP insurer of whichever vehicle was at fault. If your own driver caused it, that's the Green Slip of the car you were in, even when the driver is a friend or family member. The insurer responds to the claim, not the driver personally.

Passengers in a crash between two cars sometimes find that each driver blames the other and neither insurer will accept the claim at first. You don't have to take sides. Give an honest account of what you saw, lodge on time, and let the fault question be worked out between the insurers. If it stalls, that's when advice helps most.

Read next:Passenger injury claims

Contributory negligence: when you share the blame

Insurers look at more than who hit whom. They may ask whether you wore a seatbelt, how fast you were going and whether you were distracted. The finding is usually a percentage. A small one trims damages and later weekly payments. One greater than 61% has a much bigger effect, because it rules out damages altogether.

Check the percentage

A contributory negligence finding is usually expressed as a percentage. A few points either side of the 'mostly at fault' line can decide whether damages are possible at all, so ask how the figure was worked out.

Read next:Can I claim if I was partly at fault?

The other driver blames you: what now?

If the other driver says you caused the crash, or the insurer won't accept that the other driver did, the evidence decides it. This is the point where an independent lawyer is often worth talking to. They can test the insurer's reasons, gather what's missing and advise whether to ask for a review. Insurers make decisions under the scheme rules, and those decisions can be challenged.

Read next:At-fault self-check

Do you need a lawyer for a fault question?

A lawyer isn't a box to tick after every crash. When fault is clear and accepted, many people run their own claim. When it's argued, split or pinned on you, advice is often worth having.

Often worth talking to a lawyer

  • Your injury may be more than a threshold injury and fault will decide damages
  • No driver seems to be at fault and you've been told you can't claim
  • Fault is split between several drivers and no insurer will take the claim
  • A seatbelt or speed argument is being used to cut your claim

You may not need one

  • You were a passenger and nobody disputes which driver caused it
  • It was a clear rear-end collision and liability is accepted
  • Fault isn't argued and your benefits are being paid

Before any fault argument, get the right care. We can connect you with doctors and allied health experienced with CTP claims, who can treat you and complete a clear Certificate of Fitness whatever happens with fault.

Not quite your situation?

Frequently asked questions

Ready to talk it through?

Get a free, no-obligation claim check. It's the first step toward understanding where your claim stands and what help it needs.

CTP Lawyer is not a law firm. This page is general information, not legal advice; the independent lawyer you speak with can advise on your own situation.

Call now(02) 7238 7379Free claim check