Goulburn & Southern Tablelands · Car accident lawyer help

Car accident lawyer, Currawang: who was at fault?

Free, by phone or online. We tell you honestly whether a fault question needs a lawyer.

A rear-end crash in traffic, a collision at an intersection, a lane change that went wrong: around Currawang, as anywhere in NSW, the injury claim usually goes to the insurer of the vehicle at fault. When that is obvious, many people never need a lawyer. When the drivers disagree or the insurer says you contributed, advice is often worth having. Our free check helps you tell which situation you're in.

Postcode: 2580

  • Free claim check, no obligation
  • By phone & online, no office to visit
  • Helping people in Currawang & Collector

Where fault leaves your claim: four common positions

The insurer will form a view about who caused the crash, and that view shapes the rest of your claim. Find the situation closest to yours below, then check the detail with someone who can see your evidence.

  1. Situation 1

    You were not at fault

    No share of the fault is the strongest position. Benefits come from the at-fault vehicle's insurer, and a lump sum damages claim may follow if your injury isn't a threshold injury. The insurer still needs evidence before it accepts fault.

  2. Situation 2

    You were partly at fault

    If you contributed to the crash or your injuries, for example by not wearing a seatbelt, the insurer may argue contributory negligence. Weekly payments after 52 weeks may be reduced, and any damages can be reduced by your share.

  3. Situation 3

    You were wholly or mostly at fault

    'Mostly at fault' means contributory negligence greater than 61%. Weekly payments and treatment and care are then generally limited to the first 52 weeks, with no common law damages. Children 16 and under keep treatment and care for as long as they need it.

  4. Situation 4

    No one was clearly at fault

    When a crash was nobody's fault, the claim isn't necessarily over. Under the 'blameless accident' rules, an injured person may be able to claim as if someone were at fault. Whether they apply depends on the facts.

General information, not legal advice. Fault and contributory negligence are decided on the evidence. Time limits apply.

Driving in and around Currawang: fault in local crashes

The Hume Highway and the Federal Highway carry traffic between Sydney, Goulburn and Canberra. The ACT has its own scheme, so if the crash was across the border, different rules may apply. Fault is decided on the evidence as a whole. Skid marks, damage patterns and the final positions of the cars can say more than either driver's account. Traffic slows for pick-ups, bus stops and people crossing. A low-speed collision in that setting can still raise real questions about who should have given way, so note what each vehicle was doing.

Region
Goulburn & Southern Tablelands
Postcode
2580
Transport in the region
Southern Highlands Line trains to Goulburn · NSW TrainLink XPT (Sydney–Melbourne) and Canberra trains through Goulburn, with the Canberra service also stopping at Tarago

Do you need a lawyer for a fault question?

Whether you need legal help depends less on how the crash happened and more on what the insurer decides about fault. Use these points as a rough guide, and the free claim check if you're still unsure.

Often worth talking to a lawyer

  • The insurer puts your share of fault above 61%
  • Fault is split between several drivers and no insurer will take the claim
  • No driver seems to be at fault and you've been told you can't claim
  • A seatbelt or speed argument is being used to cut your claim

You may not need one

  • It was a clear rear-end collision and liability is accepted
  • You only need help identifying the at-fault vehicle's insurer
  • Your question is about payments, not about who caused the crash

Fault may be the legal question, but evidence decides it. Keep the police event number, photos, dashcam footage and witness details together, and write down your own account while it's fresh. What to do after a car accident

Not quite your situation?

The first hours after a crash, and the question of fault

You don't need to decide who caused the crash at the scene, and it's wiser not to argue about it there. Swap details, stay calm and avoid guessing about speeds or blame. What helps most later is a clear record: photos of the vehicles' positions, the road layout and any witness who saw it happen, with their name and number.

  • The lane each vehicle was in, and any lane change
  • Where each car came to rest, photographed before moving if safe
  • Names and phone numbers of anyone who saw it
  • Weather, light and the road surface at the time

Read next:What to do after a car accident in NSW

How fault is shown after a car crash

An independent witness, someone with no link to either driver, can carry real weight. Get their name and phone number at the scene if you can. If you can't, the police record may have their details. Photos of the final positions of the vehicles also matter, since damage patterns often show the angle and order of impact.

Some evidence only exists for a short time: skid marks, debris, temporary signs and camera footage. Other evidence can be gathered later, such as the police record and witness statements. If fault is disputed, a lawyer can ask for footage and records to be kept and, where the claim justifies it, obtain an expert opinion on how the crash happened.

  • Dashcam footage, saved as the original file
  • Photos of both vehicles' damage and final positions
  • Independent witnesses' names and numbers
  • Camera footage from nearby shops or homes

Save footage early

Many dashcams loop and record over older files. Copy the crash footage to another device straight away, and keep the original file untouched.

A woman on a phone call, listening intently

Free claim check

Car crash near Currawang? Free fault check

Free and no obligation. Call (02) 7238 7379 or send a few details online, and we'll help you work out where fault leaves your claim.

Free · No obligation

Seatbelts, speed and your share of fault

Contributory negligence means you are found to have contributed to the crash or to your own injuries. Common examples are not wearing a seatbelt, speeding, or travelling with a driver you knew had been drinking. It doesn't usually stop a claim. It can reduce weekly payments after 52 weeks and reduce damages, and above 61% you are treated as mostly at fault.

Check the percentage

A contributory negligence finding is usually expressed as a percentage. A few points either side of the 'mostly at fault' line can decide whether damages are possible at all, so ask how the figure was worked out.

Read next:Can I claim if I was partly at fault?

If you were the passenger

Passengers usually have the simplest fault position of anyone in a crash. You weren't in control, so the question is only which driver caused it, and that decides which insurer deals with you. Where both drivers share the blame, you may still be blameless yourself. That matters later, because damages depend partly on your own share of fault.

Children in the car are in a special position. Whoever caused the crash, a child aged 16 or under at the time can keep receiving treatment and care for as long as they need it. Usually a parent or guardian lodges the claim for them. Fault can still matter for other entitlements, so keep the police record with the rest of the child's claim papers.

Read next:Passenger injury claims

Chain crashes and split blame

Chain collisions are where fault gets complicated. The driver who started it may carry most of the blame, but a driver behind who was following too closely can share it. Each vehicle has its own Green Slip insurer. Your task is to record every vehicle involved and the order of the impacts; the insurers' task is to sort out which of them responds.

If you were hit from behind and pushed into the car in front, you may have been blameless in both impacts. Make that clear in your account: which impact came first, and whether you had stopped before being hit. Insurers sometimes treat a chain crash as one event, and the sequence is what shows your own share was nil.

Read next:Multi-vehicle accidents

Why fault matters more for a lump sum than for benefits

Fault works more like a dial than a switch. A small share reduces some later entitlements. A share above 61% limits benefits to the first 52 weeks and rules out damages. No share at all keeps every option open. Knowing where the evidence puts you on that dial helps you decide whether a lawyer's view is worth having before the insurer settles its position.

Rules change

The fault rules and benefit limits described here apply to accidents from 1 April 2023. Earlier accidents can have different limits, so check the rules for your accident date.

Read next:At fault vs not at fault

Fault disputes: when a lawyer is worth a call

If the other driver says you caused the crash, or the insurer won't accept that the other driver did, the evidence decides it. This is the point where an independent lawyer is often worth talking to. They can test the insurer's reasons, gather what's missing and advise whether to ask for a review. Insurers make decisions under the scheme rules, and those decisions can be challenged.

Read next:At-fault self-check

Frequently asked questions

Ready to talk it through?

Get a free, no-obligation claim check. It's the first step toward understanding where your claim stands and what help it needs.

CTP Lawyer is not a law firm. This page is general information, not legal advice; the independent lawyer you speak with can advise on your own situation.

Call now — (02) 7238 7379Free claim check