Lower North Shore & Ryde · Car accident lawyer help

Partly at fault? Car crash lawyer help for Crows Nest

Not every fault question needs a lawyer. The free check tells you whether yours does.

You don't have to prove fault on the day of the crash, but what you notice then can matter later. Lanes, signals, where the cars stopped and what was said all feed into the insurer's view. For people in Crows Nest, we explain how fault is weighed in a NSW claim and help you decide whether the question needs a lawyer. Often it doesn't. When it does, we'll connect you with one.

Postcode: 2065

  • Free claim check, no obligation
  • By phone & online, no office to visit
  • Helping people in Crows Nest & St Leonards

Where fault leaves your claim: four common positions

People often assume that being at fault means getting nothing. That isn't how the NSW scheme generally works. The four situations below show what usually changes as your share of the blame goes up.

  1. Situation 1

    You were not at fault

    Your claim goes to the CTP insurer of the vehicle that caused the crash. You can receive statutory benefits, and if your injury is more than a threshold injury, a common law damages claim may also be open to you.

  2. Situation 2

    You were partly at fault

    Partial fault is common and usually a question of degree. A finding of contributory negligence can lower weekly payments beyond 52 weeks and reduce damages, so the percentage the insurer picks is worth checking.

  3. Situation 3

    You were wholly or mostly at fault

    'Mostly at fault' means contributory negligence greater than 61%. Weekly payments and treatment and care are then generally limited to the first 52 weeks, with no common law damages. Children 16 and under keep treatment and care for as long as they need it.

  4. Situation 4

    No one was clearly at fault

    Some crashes happen without any driver being at fault, for example after a sudden medical episode or an unforeseeable mechanical failure. NSW has 'blameless accident' rules that may let an injured person claim in some of these cases. They are technical, so get advice.

General information, not legal advice. Fault and contributory negligence are decided on the evidence. Time limits apply.

Crows Nest roads and the question of fault

The Pacific Highway, the Warringah Freeway and Military Road carry heavy commuter traffic. A rear-end crash in a slow queue can seem clear-cut, yet the insurer still weighs the evidence before accepting who caused it. Public hospitals serving the area include Royal North Shore Hospital. Ambulance and emergency notes usually record how the crash was described on the day, which can matter if the other driver's account changes later. Streets near Crows Nest Metro station carry buses, taxis and drop-offs that stop and start without much warning. In a crash with a vehicle pulling out from the kerb, fault often depends on who had to give way.

Region
Lower North Shore & Ryde
Postcode
2065
Main roads
Pacific Highway · Willoughby Road
Nearest public hospital
Royal North Shore Hospital
Getting around
Crows Nest Metro station · St Leonards station

Do you need a lawyer for a fault question?

A lawyer isn't a box to tick after every crash. When fault is clear and accepted, many people run their own claim. When it's argued, split or pinned on you, advice is often worth having.

Often worth talking to a lawyer

  • The insurer puts your share of fault above 61%
  • The other driver changed their story after the crash
  • The other driver's insurer says you caused the crash
  • No driver seems to be at fault and you've been told you can't claim

You may not need one

  • Your question is about treatment, not about who caused the crash
  • You only need help identifying the at-fault vehicle's insurer
  • You were a passenger and nobody disputes which driver caused it

If what you need now is treatment, start there. Ask us about doctors and allied health, such as GPs, physiotherapists and psychologists, who understand CTP claims and the Certificate of Fitness.

Not quite your situation?

The first hours after a crash, and the question of fault

Fault arguments are built from small details. Before the cars are moved, if it is safe, photograph where each one stopped and the damage to each. Look for skid marks, debris and the traffic signals. Then write a short account in your own words: where you were going, what you saw, and when you first noticed the other vehicle. Keep it factual and keep it.

  • The lane each vehicle was in, and any lane change
  • What the traffic lights or give-way signs showed
  • Exactly what the other driver said, written down that day
  • Whether you and your passengers wore seatbelts

Read next:What to do after a car accident in NSW

Why fault matters more for a lump sum than for benefits

Think of the claim in two parts. Statutory benefits come first and, for most people, don't depend on who caused the crash. Common law damages come later and depend heavily on it: another driver must have been at fault, you must not have been mostly at fault, and the injury must be more than a threshold injury. That is why fault is worth attention early.

Rules change

Your accident date decides which rules apply. Accidents before 1 December 2017 fall under the older 1999 Act, and some limits changed again on 1 April 2023.

Read next:At fault vs not at fault

Two people going through a form together at a kitchen table, with a calculator and a laptop

Free claim check

Talk through who caused the crash

Free and no obligation. Call (02) 7238 7379 or send a few details online, and we'll help you work out where fault leaves your claim.

Free · No obligation

How fault is shown after a car crash

Fault is decided on evidence, not on who sounds more certain. The usual pieces are the police event number and any police record, photos of where the cars stopped, the damage to each vehicle, dashcam footage and independent witnesses. No single piece is always decisive. Together they usually show what happened, even when the drivers tell different stories.

Some evidence only exists for a short time: skid marks, debris, temporary signs and camera footage. Other evidence can be gathered later, such as the police record and witness statements. If fault is disputed, a lawyer can ask for footage and records to be kept and, where the claim justifies it, obtain an expert opinion on how the crash happened.

  • Photos of both vehicles' damage and final positions
  • Your own written account from the first days
  • Camera footage from nearby shops or homes
  • Photos of signals, signs and lane markings

Save footage early

Shops, buses and homes with cameras often keep footage only briefly. Ask in writing as soon as you can, giving the date, time and exact spot.

Passengers and fault

Passengers usually have the simplest fault position of anyone in a crash. You weren't in control, so the question is only which driver caused it, and that decides which insurer deals with you. Where both drivers share the blame, you may still be blameless yourself. That matters later, because damages depend partly on your own share of fault.

Many passengers hesitate to claim because the driver was someone close to them. It helps to know the claim is made against the CTP insurer, which exists for exactly this situation. The driver may be asked for their account, and any fault finding affects their own claim, not your right to make yours. Talk it through if you're worried about how it will land.

Read next:Passenger injury claims

Several vehicles, several insurers: working out fault

In a two-car crash, the injury claim usually goes to the CTP insurer of the car at fault, which is your own vehicle's insurer if you caused it. When fault is shared or unclear, the insurers may not agree at first. That shouldn't hold up your claim. Lodge with the insurer that fits the evidence you have, and let the fault question be worked out as the claim proceeds.

Passengers and drivers caught in the middle of a chain crash often feel stuck between insurers. Your claim generally shouldn't stall while the insurers sort out their shares. Keep a note of every call, who you spoke to and what they said. If no insurer will take responsibility, that is a good moment to ask for advice.

Read next:Multi-vehicle accidents

Seatbelts, speed and your share of fault

A seatbelt argument is the classic example. If the insurer says your injuries were worse because you weren't belted in, it may reduce what you receive. The percentage isn't set by a formula. It's argued on the evidence, including medical opinion about how each injury happened, which makes it worth checking rather than simply accepting.

Check the percentage

If the insurer puts your share of fault above 61%, damages are off the table and benefits are generally limited to 52 weeks. Most insurer decisions can be internally reviewed, generally within 28 days of receiving the decision.

Read next:Can I claim if I was partly at fault?

The other driver blames you: what now?

A fault finding isn't final just because the insurer has made it. Most insurer decisions can go to internal review, generally within 28 days of receiving the decision, and then to the Personal Injury Commission. Before you accept a finding that you were mostly at fault, have someone look at whether the evidence supports it, because so much turns on that line.

Read next:At-fault self-check

Frequently asked questions

Ready to talk it through?

Get a free, no-obligation claim check. It's the first step toward understanding where your claim stands and what help it needs.

CTP Lawyer is not a law firm. This page is general information, not legal advice; the independent lawyer you speak with can advise on your own situation.

Call now(02) 7238 7379Free claim check